Religious Argumentation in Public Debate According to John Rawls
This dissertation presents a comprehensive and critical study of the thought of John Rawls regarding religious argumentation in the public debate off a democratic, pluralist society. The author uses the method of philosophical analysis that is reflection on the meanings of concepts and on the necessary conditions for the possibility of certain types of things. The scope of this analysis has been narrowed to the problems of civic ethics and moral legitimacy in the advocacy of coercive law in a pluralistic society.This is the principle of secular citizenship which is compatible with Audia#39;s view but at odds with Rawls a#39;s freestanding ideal. Other things being ... Now, leta#39;s summarize Audia#39;s problems with fairness among religious and nonreligious citizens.
| Title | : | Religious Argumentation in Public Debate According to John Rawls |
| Author | : | Dariusz Dankowski |
| Publisher | : | ProQuest - 2008 |
You must register with us as either a Registered User before you can Download this Book. You'll be greeted by a simple sign-up page.
Once you have finished the sign-up process, you will be redirected to your download Book page.
How it works:- 1. Register a free 1 month Trial Account.
- 2. Download as many books as you like (Personal use)
- 3. Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied.
